Wednesday, October 16, 2019

What the Heck is Going on in Charlestown?

Welcome to the House of Cards: Charlestown

Today, the News and Tribune posted a story of an individual identified as John Rogers, threatening "embarrassing" info he'll release about Charlestown Democratic Mayoral Candidate Treva Hodges unless she withdrawals from the race within 24 hours. Below is from an anonymous submission on another post. Could this be the embarrassing info? Only time will tell.

Apparently there is a video floating around featuring Hodges. In the video it is stated 
"...she (Treva Hodges) openly admits to adopting two children into a home that she believed was unstable. After she was raped, she left her kids in the care of the man that abused and raped her. She also claims that law enforcement refused to file a report when she supposedly reported the rape in the first place... So she has no documentation to back up her claims of rape. No rape kit, no police report, nothing. And if this guy is a violent rapist as she says, she placed her kids in harm's way just so she could get away herself?"

Is there a video? 
Is any of this true? 

Here is the link to the breaking N&T Store: 
https://www.newsandtribune.com/indiana/online-threat-directed-at-charlestown-mayoral-candidate/article_b2f2a8c4-f03e-11e9-a5a9-639e8296013b.html


What do you think?
Do you have the scoop?
Leave your comments below.

Monday, April 8, 2019

Time to Discuss Thougths on Abortion

To be clear, this is a touchy subject. It is steeped in religious, philosophical, medical impacts and opinions. However, I want to put some thoughts out there that I've had on my mind and have not seen put into the conversation. Maybe they have never been publicly written or maybe these are to taboo to discuss. Either way, I feel like they need to be discussed and be part of the conversation. I write this in hopes that it will give people on both sides of the debate something to think about. As a disclaimer, I'm not referring to instances of rape or incest. Everything I'm about to discuss is "oops, I'm pregnant" or "I'm not worried. If I get pregnant, I'll just get it taken care of" scenarios. 

ABORTION

I feel that I don't need to go into the depths of what it is, we all know. However, I feel it's important to point out that all the arguments for allowing women to have one is "the choice". It is not a man's place to tell a woman what to do with her body. I agree, 100%. Each person's body is their own.

When does a group of cells constitute a life? That is an interesting question. All life started from bacteria that evolved. Is a group of cells evolving into a full grown human a life? Why does the appearance of person in a different stage of growth change the fact that it is alive? Are we not continually changing as we age? What is the point in our growth we are, in fact, alive? 

"The choice" to have or not have the abortion. Some will say it is a woman's choice to proceed with an abortion, whether it be early or late, heartbeat or not. However,  I would like to add this to debate. 

Let's discuss "choices" that occur before even having to consider the abortion choice. 
1.) There is a choice to allow a man to enter her body. 
2.) There is a choice to ensure the man is using protection. 
3.) Even if the man does not, there are multiple contraceptives a woman can utilize to prevent becoming pregnant. Not including abstinence, I counted 13 on the Planned Parenthood website.

If a woman becomes pregnant, has there not already been ample opportunity to have a choice that prevents the creation of another life inside the female body? 


Once a child is conceived, I would like to put another thought out there. While the female body is the one to carry the child, there were two people to make it happen. Once the child is conceived, there are now 3 people involved if you include the child (or ball of cells depending on your stance).

Taking that into account, should the two consenting adults not be the ones who have to agree to make the "choice" to abort? The man made the choice to enter the woman if she chose to allow him. If the woman has the baby, then he is responsible for that child as a parent. Should that not still be the case if the woman wants to choose to not have the child? 

As I stated above, I know this will get some fired up. I'm ok with that. I did not read Chris Morris' editorial in the News and Tribune. I did see all the comments on Facebook and that is what really got me thinking about this. All I am trying to do is share thoughts that will make people think.

So many times we take a stance and not REALLY listen to someone else's point of view. I'm asking that after you read this, you read it again with an open mind. Try to put your personal feelings aside and consider a different point of view. Before you respond in the comments, truly try to remove any hate or malice you may have against those who don't agree with you. You may be answering from a point of principle never having had to make the choice. Maybe you have. Maybe you are the man who morns in silence the loss of a child you never had the chance to know. Maybe you are the woman who regrets having made the choice. Maybe you are the woman who celebrates it. 


Please leave your comments below. 
While this is a personal topic, please be respectful of those who have thoughts. 
Comments can be left anonymously if you choose. 

Monday, February 25, 2019

N&T: Our System is not "Busted" and Race is not the Reason for Low Racial Diversity

Monday Morning. 7:45am. 2/25/19.

I just walked into my office after starting a pot of coffee. The smell of fresh ground coffee beans fills the air as the sound of the hot, brown water starts to fill the coffee pot.

As I often do, I bring up the News & Tribune website to browse the latest local headlines. Today's have me tilting my head and wondering how these two articles land on the front page. The only thing I can think of is the N&T sowing the seeds of liberalism by misrepresenting the facts with one sided opinions. 

With that, I will offer a different set of opinions. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dale Moss wrote this piece about how Dan Canon thinks local politics is busted. He can't seem to figure out why he lost. In the article he is quoted saying:

"I went into it, from day one, to represent people against power..."

Let's think on that for a moment; people against power. What does that even mean? As I read through the entire piece, the only thing that jumps out at me is that this guys just doesn't get it. We don't live in a dictatorship. We live in a republic where we democratically elect our representatives. If you are working against the people in power, you are working against the majority of your neighbors who took part in a fair election. 

What Dan Canon stands for is everything wrong with our system, not the other way around. He simply wants to oppose the majority with "HIS" vision, not support "OUR" vision. 

Dan lost because he is only interested in the few, not the all. Dan lost because he ran a campaign of attacking his opponent. He lost because he just doesn't understand the simple life lesson that you will catch more bees with sugar.

So here we are, almost as year after he lost in the primary. He is still complaining about things being "busted". It's not busted. It is working exactly how it was meant to work. Change is slow. If he wants to change things, then maybe he needs to go about doing it a different way, be an educator. Honestly, the way he is currently going about getting people to support him is "busted".


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The next head scratcher is talking about how there is low racial diversity in local government. Oookkkaaayyyyy……..

On a date in early February, there is a filing deadline. People show up at an office and fill out a piece of paper to run for an office. They check box to show which political party they are with, where they live and such. Then in May, those who identify with the beliefs of that political party elect which from the group of candidates they want to run against the other political parties in November. In November, everyone comes out to vote for the ones they think will represent them the best. Some vote for a party while other for the person in each race.

Here's the key to all of this; there is low diversity in local government because very few people who may be from a (insert diversity) diverse background sign up to run for the office.

The even bigger thing to consider is not just who is running, but is that person running actually capable of being that elected representative? Just because they come from a specific type of labeled minority does not mean that diversity is an automatic license to know all things or be all things. 

Here is why I say that... Shawn Carruthers was elected in a community that arguably has the highest concentration of affluent, white people in this part of Southern Indiana. Do you know why they elected him? It's because of what he stood for. It's because he's a good man. It's because his message resonated with more people than his opponent. He didn't win the race because of race. He won the race because the people who elected him believed he was the best man for the job. 

Some will say the people elected a black man over a white man. I WOULD ISSUE THIS CORRECTION: They elected one man over another man. 

Here comes a truth bomb and I WHOLEHEARTEDLY BELIEVE THIS.... Most people do not see color anymore. Those who do, seem to be the ones to make sure to call you racist for not seeing color or call you homophobic for not supporting a gay man/woman for office. 
(DISCLAIMER: Yes, there are people to judge based on race, sexual preference, etc. I contend THOSE people are the real minority, the ones who judge based on race, religion, etc...)

People vote for who they know. They vote for who will do the best job. They vote for who speaks to their topics. The people who lose are the ones who are talking about things that don't matter to the ones they are asking for votes from. The fact there is low "racial" diversity is the same reason there is low "sexual preference" diversity, low "religious" diversity, low "gender" diversity, low "educational" diversity, low "insert diversity" diversity. 

In reality, those diverse people who could be a great candidate are not filing to run for office. If they are, and they don't win, I contest it's not because of (insert) diversity, it's because they weren't the best person for the job. If they were, then they did a poor job of getting people behind them which coincidentally is a key part of being an effective office holder. 

And again, this is all another reason our system is not "busted". 



What do you think?
Do you have the scoop?
Let us know in the comments below.

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

What's in Store for 2019?

2019 Will Be, Should Be Fun!

It's local election time for Southern Indiana. What a fun time this will be to see how all the local races shake out!

Let's start with the Mayor Races.
In Charlestown, Mayor Hall has been trying to clean up his city. While no one can argue his intentions, his methods have raised lots of eyebrows and attracted national attention, but not in a good way. i.e. Pleasant Ridge.

I've been hard pressed to find anyone outside of the residents of Pleasant Ridge who doesn't think the temporary housing units of WW2 have outlived their intended life. I was extremely surprised when Indiana Landmarks jumped in to help save them. If you've never been there, take a drive and form your own opinion. I do know that before Mayor Hall jumped in on this area, it accounted for proximately 80% of all crime activity in the City.

Moving forward, Mayor Hall has to face former Democrat turned Trump Republican David Abbott. Dave is the classic run for everything politician. I honestly don't think Dave has a shot. Once past Dave, Mayor Hall will face newcomer ultra-liberal Treva Hodges. She has no shot in my opinion as she is way to left leaning for such a rural community.


In New Albany, Mayor Gahan has a very real challenger in David White who came close to knocking him off in the last cycle. The question is, how much has Mayor Gahan done and will the baggage of some of his administration be used against him?

On the Republican side, longtime County Commissioner Mark Seabrook has finally stepped up to actually file to run for Mayor. The real and honest question I've been hearing from both sides of the isle is, does he still have the health to work a campaign and has he passed his prime?

While he has been in county politics for what seems like forever, no one really knows what his platform is. I heard one of his campaign representatives say recently he is "currently listening to what the people want." For someone who has been involved as much as he has not to have at least a handful foundational policy stances is a little bit concerning. So far, I'm not really impressed and think Councilman Al Knable would have made a better Mayoral candidate to over come the left leaning city of New Albany.


In Jeffersonville, there's going to be a replay of the past with the exception of role reversal: Former Mayor Galligan Vs. Mayor Moore. Mayor Moore is riding high on the growth of business and infrastructure improvements throughout the city. Former Mayor Galligan is running out of spite the best I can tell. Maybe he's mad about the canal, maybe it's because he's bored, who knows.

I don't think and haven't heard of anyone else jumping in on this race so we will have to wait to see things heat up as we approach November. One thing is for certain, the closer to November we get, the more fireworks we will see in this race. If you want my opinion, TG would've been better off not throwing the hat in on this. I personally think he's going to embarrass himself. Barring some major unearthed scandal out of the Mayor Moore camp, I cannot think of a single person who can realistically give Mayor Moore a real contest.


Council races across the region: There hasn't been many surprises so far but we are still a week out from the filing deadline. I'll withhold my complete thoughts until after. The two interesting in-district primary contests so far will be Bill Burns taking on Ed Z in Jeffersonville and Scott McVoy taking on Martina Webster in Sellersburg.


What are your thoughts?
Do you have the scoop?
Put them in the comments below!

Thursday, December 6, 2018

Take Your Ball and Stay Home

"Honestly, it's a bit of a relief that I didn't win because going up to Indianapolis all the time was going to be a huge hassle and take a lot more time away from my family. Now I will have many fewer worries and obligations than I would have if I won. On top of all that, I knew that I wouldn't realistically be able to accomplish much in Indianapolis, especially since we only won one other seat in the Senate. I may have had a slight impact, but there is still an overwhelming Republican super majority, so all of the additional effort for me to be in Indianapolis would ultimately not create much real change. So there is definitely a silver lining to losing. Freedom."
-Anna Murray

So here we are, post election. I've been sitting back watching all the former candidates. Some of them are now "office-elect" and others are just former candidates. So far most have been gracious with the exception of two. Anna by far is the biggest disappointment in how she's handled herself. 

Above is from a public Facebook post she made on November 8th. Such a let down. What a slap in the face to all that supported her. 

"...relief I didn't win..."??? 

For a person to come off after an election where she so humbly asked for people to support her only to find out she didn't want to be there in the first place is truly a let down. I respect anyone who puts themselves in a position to hold office but complaining about what it would've been like to have won is not the kind of people we need to have in office. 

I compare it to the person who shows up to work everyday pissed off they are there. They are always negative, disconnected, and always place blame on others. Not to mention they have no allies to work with and are generally ineffective. 

I think Southern Indiana as well as our state dodged a bullet by not electing Anna to the Senate. Let's hope she stays away although rumor has it she is looking at running for a local office. Mark my words, if she does and manages to get elected, her mark on our community will not be a positive one.

What do you think?
Do you have the scoop?
Put it in the comments below.

Friday, November 2, 2018

Anna Murray Violates IN Law

UPDATE on Indiana Senate 46 Race
Anna Murray (D) Knowingly Violates Indiana Campaign Finance Laws

A development in the IN Senate District 46 race everyone needs to be aware of. Attorney Anna Murray didn’t follow Indiana campaign laws. She violated the law 4 separate times for not reporting a total $15,000 in contributions in accordance with the state statute. 

Ron Grooms’ quote says it all. As an attorney, she knows better but violated the law anyway. It’s just another example as to why Senator Grooms is the best person for the job. 




Wednesday, October 24, 2018

RACE WATCH: Watson V. Hollingsworth

RACE WATCH: Liz Watson V. Trey Hollingsworth

Democrat Candidate Liz Watson is by far a superior candidate to challenge Republican Trey Hollingsworth than his previous opponent. Liz has been able to capture the "new" democratic party voters who believe a socialist government is the way to go. 

Here's the other side of the story. Regardless of how vocal her supporters are, there are far too few of them outside of Bloomington to make an impact. The Bernie Sanders Democrats are funny to me. They are listening to a Senator who has spent more time in congress than they've been alive while believing in "change". 

While they attack Trey about being a Washington insider, they conveniently forget the fact that Liz IS a Washington insider. She spent all of her professional career in Washington as a lobbyist. This is something that has not been brought to the front of the conversation by the Hollingsworth campaign yet, but I believe it is probably one of the most important items that voters are not aware of. 

When it comes down to it, the 9th District used to be a coin toss. In more recent history, it leans heavily to the right. I believe it is because of this "new" socialist-democrat platform. I think that if the democrats fielded a moderate Bill Clinton type of candidate, for any race, they would have a really strong chance of taking hold of congress. 

In this time of divisiveness, I think both parties and the county as whole would be in a better place if everyone took two steps to the center of the political spectrum. The extreme right and extreme left are pulling this country apart. I long for the time of non-partisan common ground that we saw in the late 1990's. It wasn't about who controlled congress or the presidency, but about doing what was right for the country.  

...I digress...


While Trey is more "right" than some would like and Liz is more "left" then others would like, I think Trey wins this race easily. While not everyone agrees with his stances, there is no doubt he is engaged in the process, extremely knowledgeable about the topics, and in my experience very easily accessible. This is especially true if you are willing to have a productive conversation. Now, if you are one of those who only wants to make a scene and yell, that's a different conversation totally. 

I know he has taken some heat for not having townhall meetings. I honestly don't blame him. When the far left take advantage of those situations by making a scene so their group can record and edit it to make attack ads, nothing productive comes from those meetings. We have seen over and over again where those people crash the event and make a circus out of it. Some people do not conduct themselves with dignity, class, and patience. If "those" people would take a chill pill to have a REAL conversation, be open minded about what the responses might be, then maybe some elected officials would be more open to "townhall". A large dose of understanding is needed to comprehend that you are not going to agree with every thing someone else does. But be an adult and don't be turned off because of one or two issues. 

Liz Watson and her core followers have perpetuated the cycle of this type of behavior. Most recently this was showcased at the local Farm Bureau Meet the Candidates event. Liz and her group highjacked the event by preventing real conversations from being had. She brought a very rude group who automatically placed everyone on high alert. She falsely accused Hollingsworth of skipping the event when even the moderator stated he was never scheduled to be there because he was already committed in a different part of the district before the Farm Bureau event was planned. It was such a self centered showing, it even upset the local democrats because she showed no concern for what they had to say. When there is a limited time per candidate, out of respect for everyone, stick to your time. Don't overrun your time by more than double then have your people play "gotcha" by feeding a 6 year old little girl the questions. To me it was a shameless display that disrespected everyone who attended to learn about each candidate including her fellow democrats.

Below is a link of a website I follow. This site compiles different polls into one forecast. 


All things being considered, I predict Hollingsworth by 9-10 points.


Do you have the scoop?
What's your thoughts?
Put them in the comments below.

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

RACE WATCH: Perkins V. Garten


RACE WATCH: Perkins (older) Vs. Garten (younger)


I have written on this subject before. However, they have both videotaped a series with WLKY where they both answer the same questions. Obviously they are going to have opposite answers. What really stands out to me is not just what they say but how they say it. The image that is projected from each is very telling. I have my own opinions but I'll keep them to myself. You be the judge.

Check them out below.


JUST JOKING! Of course I'm going to tell you what I think. This isn't a newspaper, it's my blog.

Perkins looks like a tired old man, unsure of himself and in what he's saying. It is clear to me he is well past his prime and is only reading what someone has told him to say because it's popular within the new democratic party. Garten, on the other hand, looks like a leader. Someone in his prime who is ready to make a real impact and not play games.

When the time comes for who I would want to by my representative, hands down Garten.

Projection: Garten wins by more than 25 points.


Do you have the scoop? 
Tell us what you think.
Put your comments below. 

Monday, September 17, 2018

RACE WATCH: Murray V. Grooms


                    
          Senator Ron Groom                 Vs.          Senate Hopeful Anna Murray

RACE WATCH:

Anna Murray V. Ron Grooms

Two candidates could not be more polar opposite. On one side is Anna Murray, a Dan Canon disciple California democrat who is as far left as Bernie Sanders, maybe farther. On the other is Ron Grooms, an even keeled old school republican who has spent years making a positive impact on our community.

I find this race interesting to watch. With the overlap of Urban Clark County, Rural Floyd County, and Urban Floyd County weighing in on this race, I feel it will be a good test to how much of the republican base has eroded due to President Trump. It may be true that New Albany is an apparent Socialist Democrat stronghold here in Southern Indiana, but will that base turn out for Anna Murray? Only time will tell. My guess is that they will.

Ron Grooms has been a longtime elected city official and now 2 term state senator. Because of the name recognition and voting history of Sen. Grooms, I'm going to not review his stats in-depth. The Grooms highlights compared to Anna's website are (IMHO):

-On the surface, Grooms may be against medical marijuana because of how it's being pushed. But I don't think he's flat out against it, just the rush to embrace it. Remember, marijuana is still a controlled substance under federal law. I think that plays into his decision more than anything. Years ago, synthetic opioids were pushed the same way medical weed is being pushed now, as a fix all for pain. Now we have an opioid epidemic. Weed may have some benefits medically, but without hard evidence Grooms will be hesitant to jump on board the train. However, I do know he is open to it. Remember, he is a pharmacist. He understands the impact of drugs better than most.

-Anna talks about respect. I've known Ron for years and he is one of the most respectful people I know. In fact, I know a lot of people who could learn a thing or two on how to treat people by learning from him.

-Anna talks about gerrymandering for votes. That is a mythological issues that someone has told her to use on a website. She refers to districts in other states as having issues. She can't even put an example of a district in Indiana to support her claims. Instead she has a district picture outside Pittsburg? In fact, we don't really have much of that here. If you know our community and the way the districts are done, it is in an attempt not separate neighborhoods while meeting the population requirements.

-And of course, like every good Democrat, Anna is supportive of Unions and raising the minimum wage. If she would take a step back from drinking the socialist democrat Kool-Aid for a second, she would see that raising the minimum wage would do nothing. There are jobs EVERYWHERE! Please, show me one that pays $7.25 minimum wage.  Go ahead. I'll wait... Waiting....  Waiting...….   You can't because there are none. This is called a free market. No one is going to pay $7.25 because when there are so many jobs they have to compete for workers. Don't like working where you are, drive down the road to one of the 5000 now hiring signs and apply. If they don't pay more that you are making now, keep looking. In all seriousness, there are 100's if not 1000's of local jobs right now that are paying $16-$18/hr starting out.

So what would raising minimum wage really do? Increase inflation. Grooms understands this. He also understands that if someone doesn't like how much they are being paid, that person can go find a new and better one that pays more. I guess Anna is a "handout mother figure" type of lady while Ron is more of a "responsibility for yourself" type guy.


Anna is a really nice woman. If you speak to her, she's very personable and easily likeable. But once you scratch the surface, I have found someone who is out classed compared to Sen. Grooms who has no real experience in the arenas that make up her platform. Most of her thoughts are based on feelings instead of facts, theory instead of proof. Of course she's endorsed by every union and LTGB group there is because they won't speak to anyone who's not a Democrat. I really don't put much stock in those endorsements nor most endorsements for that matter, for either side.

When the sun sets on this November election, one question will ring true: Did the very vocal minority of Socialist Democrats make enough headway to pull the old school conservative Steve Stemler type Democrats into their camp?

I say no way that happens. Every major Democrat running in this upcoming race is too far left to really have an impact in my opinion. If they were just left of center, everyone of them would probably have a real shot. The fact of the matter is they are all left of left and that is just too big of a swing for a majority of Southern Indiana Hoosiers.

I predict that Anna works hard with lots of little signs out but Ron has the edge in this race and will live to see his third term in the statehouse.


What are your thoughts? 
Do you have the scoop?
Let us know in the comments below.

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

9/11 and Our Children



For so many of us, 9/11 will forever be on the surface of our emotions. Even after 17 years, the memories and feelings of that day are as new and vivid as the moment the Earth stood still.

I remember sitting on the edge of my bed that morning (it happened to be my day off work) tuning into the Today Show after making a cup of coffee. I had just picked up the phone to call my Mom to tell her to turn on the TV because a plane flew into a building in New York. As I was sitting there telling her about it, you could see another plane come in from the edge of the screen only to disappear into the building turning into a giant fireball.

I remember the feeling in my chest and turning of my stomach as I sat there in disbelief. I can remember the horrific and immediate realization that I had just witnessed the deaths of so many people only to realize later the full scope of the devastation of that day.

Stories like that are plenty and common as we all reflect on where we were. As a parent of young child who is starting to understand the mysteries of life and death, this morning I found myself trying to wrap my head around how to explain the memory of this day.

It was only a few weekends ago I listened to Joe Lieberman speak of his friend, John McCain. As I sat there listening, I found myself in tears thinking about the man our country had lost. I chuckled at Presidents Obama and Bush's take on a man who was their rival but also partner. A partner who had his beliefs but also understood his were not the only beliefs. A man who embodied the word forgiveness for his leadership with those who were his captors. A leader who knew our country must have balanced politics because partisanship would be our downfall. If you did not hear Lieberman, Kissinger, Bush, and Obama speak about McCain, you should.

As I sat there driving and listening in tears, my child ask me what was wrong. It was not a question I was prepared for. I did the best I could in terms that could be understood by a child.

Fast forward to today. This generations version of "a day that will live in infamy" is a day that needs to be shared and taught to the next generations. If you have young children, don't rely on the history books for this. Share your story with them. Help them understand the meaning and impact on you.

To help me work through how to handle explaining this day to my child, I found the below article I thought I'd share.

In honor of all those who lost their lives on 9/11 in New York, the Pentagon, and Flight 93:

I Pray for You and Your Families. Your deaths will NEVER BE FORGOTTEN in my heart or my home.

--------------------------------


How to talk to your kids about 9/11
The date September 11, 2001 became is now etched in history. How do you explain to kids the sheer magnitude of what happened? And how do you reassure them about the acts of terrorism on U.S. soil?
For so many people in the U.S., September 11, 2001 is a day forever engraved so deeply in memory that it could have been yesterday. That Tuesday, the brilliant blue sky, warm sunlight and crisp morning air striking in its beauty was shattered when everything changed fundamentally in an instant.
But for children — both those who were very young on that day and those that hadn't yet been born — the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 are a little removed. What were they? What does it mean? And how did it all change our world?

As parents, it's our job to explain these things to our children.

Explaining 9/11 to kids


Whether your children are in preschool, elementary, middle or high school, it's important that you speak about that tragic and devastating day with them so that they understand the heartbreak that America collectively felt. September 11, 2001 is a part of our modern history. How should you do it?

Be real


Honesty is important when talking about September 11 with your children, so don't be afraid to share how you really felt that day. "Kids pick up on how you really feel beneath your words. They will become more frightened because now they know they can't trust you to tell them the truth," says Carole Lieberman, M.D., psychiatrist and author of Coping with Terrorism: Dreams Interrupted.

Do something


There are so many opportunities to turn the pain of September 11 into something more positive. Mark this year's anniversary with actions that help someone else — or remember those that were lost. "Do something as a family on 9/11 to memorialize the day and pay tribute to those who died. For example, go to your house of worship, light a candle at home and say a prayer, donate money to a 9/11 fund for survivors," says Lieberman.

Be proactive


Terrorism didn't end with the death of Osama Bin Laden. It's OK to explain that to your kids so they understand that although there is still a threat of terrorism, there is a lot being done to prevent another attack from happening. "Talk about the ongoing threat of terrorism and how you will prepare as a family by doing things to keep yourselves healthy — psychologically and physically," says Lieberman.

Using books to talk about the attacks


Books can really help you with explaining 9/11 to kids, when you aren't sure where to start. "Sometimes it's hard to know what to say. But there are lots of age-appropriate children's books about 9/11 that can help get the conversation going," says Michael D. Baran, Ph.D., a cultural anthropologist and director of Cambridge Diversity Consulting.

Here are a few that might be good for your kids:


Keep it age appropriate


Older children are probably ready to hear and see more about the attacks so that they can understand what happened more deeply. But for younger children, it's enough to be truthful without sharing everything. "To the younger children they will be told that there are some people who do not like our country. These bad people thought that it was important to hurt the United States in a very bad way. What they did caused many people to die and suffer much pain," says Lorna Kemper, a 1st grade teacher at Gethsemane Lutheran School in Tempe, Arizona.
And really, isn't that what it's really about? In the simplest of terms, the attacks of 9/11 came down to decisions that were made to hurt innocent people because of a hatred for the country that we love. Teach your children to take pride in the country they live in by honoring days such as 9/11 each year. Most adults will remember vividly in the days, weeks and months following the attacks how many homes raised an American flag and flew it proudly. Fly your flag and remember those who were lost, and you not only help your kids learn, you help our country band together.